Navigating the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020
COVID-19 has made 2020 a difficult year, in many ways.
The LJCA and our neighbors are not immune to the effects of the global pandemic, and our first concern is everyone's health and safety. Our condolences go out to the those who have lost loved ones, and our appreciation to front line workers.
That being said, we have and will continue to conduct business per the guidelines of the Virginia Department of Health, specifically the regulated recommendations under Social Gatherings and Public Indoor Spaces.
Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised Official Interpretations
Navigating Robert's Rules during stay at home orders has been an obstacle,. Luckily we live in an age of technology that allows electronic meetings, and guidance from others for how to conduct business.
More information on 2020-1, 2020-2, and 2020-3 can be found here:
Robert's Rules of Order, Pandemic-Related Official Interpretations
2020-1
Electronic Meetings and Ratification
"An assembly can ratify “action taken by officers, committees, delegates, or subordinate bodies in excess of their instructions or authority.” [RONR (11th ed.), p. 124, ll. 34-35.] This includes the ability to ratify action to carry out decisions made at an electronic meeting of a body for which such meetings are not authorized. Similar actions taken by an organization’s staff can also be ratified. However, those who carry out decisions made at an unauthorized electronic meeting do so at their own risk; although the assembly can later ratify their actions at a proper meeting of the organization, it is under no obligation to do so. [Cf. p. 348, ll. 19-23.]"
-----
For those looking for more layman terms:
"Electronic Meetings and Ratification
Many businesses and organizations have yet to change their bylaws to allow for electronic meetings. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (RONR) updated its rules with #2020-1 which addresses the question of whether a board can hold an electronic meeting and then allow the officers to carry out decisions they made at that meeting and then formally ratify them at a later in-person meeting.
RONR affirms that an assembly can ratify actions that officers, committees, delegates, or subordinate bodies make in excess of their instructions or authority as described in RONR, 11th edition, page 124, II. 34-35. The rule also allows assemblies to ratify actions to carry out decisions they made during electronic meetings where meetings aren’t authorized. The organization may also ratify similar actions taken by the organization’s staff. As a word of caution, while it’s allowable for certain individuals to carry out decisions that were made at an unauthorized electronic meeting, the assembly isn’t obligated to ratify the unauthorized meetings’ decisions. To prevent this problem, organizations might consider making changes to their bylaws to allow electronic meetings that have the same bearing as in-person meetings.
Instructions for a Previously Appointed Committee to Meet Electronically
A situation that many boards have encountered lately is that they set up committees and assigned them specific tasks, but those committees haven’t been able to meet in person because of the pandemic. RONR rule 2020-2 states that boards that after boards have appointed special committees the board can move and vote to authorize a committee to meet electronically.
To be considered an official meeting, a board of directors has to establish that the group can hold an electronic meeting in their bylaws. For committees that aren’t expressly established by the bylaws, the committees can hold electronic meetings by a standing rule of the organization or by making a motion that establishes the committee.
In addition, RONR rules allow for an assembly to give a committee additional instructions related to a question that’s been assigned to them at any time before the committee submits its report, even if the committee meets at another session. An executive board can authorize committees to meet electronically while they’re considering questions given to them by the board. Committees may meet electronically to determine whether they can come to a unanimous agreement on what to include in their report even if they’re not authorized to meet electronically.
Handling Vacancies and Late Elections
If your bylaws specify terms for board directors, and they don’t specify that officers remain in their positions until their successors are elected, the officers’ positions will become vacant on the date noted in your bylaws for the beginning of the new term. This poses a problem if the board isn’t able to meet in person to elect new officers because it leaves them without a fully appointed board of directors.
RONR 2020-3 states that if an organization whose bylaws permit its executive board to have authority over the organization’s affairs in between meetings, including having the right to fill vacancies, the board can accept resignations and fill vacancies between meetings. It’s always prudent for boards to fill board officer vacancies as soon as possible.
By contrast, if the bylaws state that the board can elect or appoint officers to fill vacancies for the rest of the term or until the expiration of the term, board officers would continue to remain in their positions until the end of the term and then the board wouldn’t need to hold another election to fill the positions.
If the bylaws don’t contain similar language that addresses how to fill mid-term vacancies, it doesn’t override the membership’s power to regularly elect new officers. Boards should consider the importance of giving the membership the responsibility and opportunity to hold annual elections while giving the board enough power between meetings so that it can fill any unexpected vacancies.
The assembly should hold elections at the next meeting and as each new vacancy is filled, the new officer replaces the person that was appointed to fill the position for the remainder of the term. It’s preferred for the assembly to have an opportunity to hold a regular election where everyone gets a proper vote even when the election has to be scheduled at some time other than the regularly scheduled time."
Source: https://www.boardeffect.com/blog/new-changes-roberts-rules-order/
The LJCA and our neighbors are not immune to the effects of the global pandemic, and our first concern is everyone's health and safety. Our condolences go out to the those who have lost loved ones, and our appreciation to front line workers.
That being said, we have and will continue to conduct business per the guidelines of the Virginia Department of Health, specifically the regulated recommendations under Social Gatherings and Public Indoor Spaces.
Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised Official Interpretations
Navigating Robert's Rules during stay at home orders has been an obstacle,. Luckily we live in an age of technology that allows electronic meetings, and guidance from others for how to conduct business.
More information on 2020-1, 2020-2, and 2020-3 can be found here:
Robert's Rules of Order, Pandemic-Related Official Interpretations
2020-1
Electronic Meetings and Ratification
"An assembly can ratify “action taken by officers, committees, delegates, or subordinate bodies in excess of their instructions or authority.” [RONR (11th ed.), p. 124, ll. 34-35.] This includes the ability to ratify action to carry out decisions made at an electronic meeting of a body for which such meetings are not authorized. Similar actions taken by an organization’s staff can also be ratified. However, those who carry out decisions made at an unauthorized electronic meeting do so at their own risk; although the assembly can later ratify their actions at a proper meeting of the organization, it is under no obligation to do so. [Cf. p. 348, ll. 19-23.]"
-----
For those looking for more layman terms:
"Electronic Meetings and Ratification
Many businesses and organizations have yet to change their bylaws to allow for electronic meetings. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (RONR) updated its rules with #2020-1 which addresses the question of whether a board can hold an electronic meeting and then allow the officers to carry out decisions they made at that meeting and then formally ratify them at a later in-person meeting.
RONR affirms that an assembly can ratify actions that officers, committees, delegates, or subordinate bodies make in excess of their instructions or authority as described in RONR, 11th edition, page 124, II. 34-35. The rule also allows assemblies to ratify actions to carry out decisions they made during electronic meetings where meetings aren’t authorized. The organization may also ratify similar actions taken by the organization’s staff. As a word of caution, while it’s allowable for certain individuals to carry out decisions that were made at an unauthorized electronic meeting, the assembly isn’t obligated to ratify the unauthorized meetings’ decisions. To prevent this problem, organizations might consider making changes to their bylaws to allow electronic meetings that have the same bearing as in-person meetings.
Instructions for a Previously Appointed Committee to Meet Electronically
A situation that many boards have encountered lately is that they set up committees and assigned them specific tasks, but those committees haven’t been able to meet in person because of the pandemic. RONR rule 2020-2 states that boards that after boards have appointed special committees the board can move and vote to authorize a committee to meet electronically.
To be considered an official meeting, a board of directors has to establish that the group can hold an electronic meeting in their bylaws. For committees that aren’t expressly established by the bylaws, the committees can hold electronic meetings by a standing rule of the organization or by making a motion that establishes the committee.
In addition, RONR rules allow for an assembly to give a committee additional instructions related to a question that’s been assigned to them at any time before the committee submits its report, even if the committee meets at another session. An executive board can authorize committees to meet electronically while they’re considering questions given to them by the board. Committees may meet electronically to determine whether they can come to a unanimous agreement on what to include in their report even if they’re not authorized to meet electronically.
Handling Vacancies and Late Elections
If your bylaws specify terms for board directors, and they don’t specify that officers remain in their positions until their successors are elected, the officers’ positions will become vacant on the date noted in your bylaws for the beginning of the new term. This poses a problem if the board isn’t able to meet in person to elect new officers because it leaves them without a fully appointed board of directors.
RONR 2020-3 states that if an organization whose bylaws permit its executive board to have authority over the organization’s affairs in between meetings, including having the right to fill vacancies, the board can accept resignations and fill vacancies between meetings. It’s always prudent for boards to fill board officer vacancies as soon as possible.
By contrast, if the bylaws state that the board can elect or appoint officers to fill vacancies for the rest of the term or until the expiration of the term, board officers would continue to remain in their positions until the end of the term and then the board wouldn’t need to hold another election to fill the positions.
If the bylaws don’t contain similar language that addresses how to fill mid-term vacancies, it doesn’t override the membership’s power to regularly elect new officers. Boards should consider the importance of giving the membership the responsibility and opportunity to hold annual elections while giving the board enough power between meetings so that it can fill any unexpected vacancies.
The assembly should hold elections at the next meeting and as each new vacancy is filled, the new officer replaces the person that was appointed to fill the position for the remainder of the term. It’s preferred for the assembly to have an opportunity to hold a regular election where everyone gets a proper vote even when the election has to be scheduled at some time other than the regularly scheduled time."
Source: https://www.boardeffect.com/blog/new-changes-roberts-rules-order/